The Golden Rule as a Paradigm for Fostering Prosocial Behavior With Virtual Reality

Abstract

The Golden Rule of ethics in its negative form states that you should not do to others what you would not want others to do to you, and in its positive form states that you should do to others as you would want them to do to you. The Golden Rule is an ethical principle, but in virtual reality (VR), it can also be thought of as a paradigm for the promotion of prosocial behavior. This is because in VR, you can directly experience harm that you inflicted or were complicit in inflicting from the embodied perspective of the victim. This use of what we refer to as the Golden Rule Embodiment Paradigm (GREP) relies on participants in VR having the illusion of body ownership over a virtual body. In this article, we introduce virtual embodiment and the consequent illusion of ownership over the virtual body, and describe how this phenomenon has been utilized to influence implicit attitudes. We then introduce the GREP and give examples of studies in which it enhanced helping behavior.

Transparency

Action Editor: Robert L. Goldstone
Editor: Robert L. Goldstone

References

Banakou D., Beacco A., Neyret S., Blasco-Oliver M., Seinfeld S., Slater M. (2020). Virtual body ownership and its consequences for implicit racial bias are dependent on social context. Royal Society Open Science, 7(12), Article 201848. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201848
Google Scholar
Banakou D., Groten R., Slater M. (2013). Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110(31), 12846–12851. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306779110
Google Scholar
Banakou D., Hanumanthu P. D., Slater M. (2016). Virtual embodiment of White people in a Black virtual body leads to a sustained reduction in their implicit racial bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, Article 601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00601
Google Scholar
Banakou D., Kishore S., Slater M. (2018). Virtually being Einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 917. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00917
Google Scholar
Banakou D., Slater M. (2014). Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111(49), 17678–17683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414936111
Google Scholar
Bedder R. L., Bush D., Banakou D., Peck T., Slater M., Burgess N. (2019). A mechanistic account of bodily resonance and implicit bias. Cognition, 184, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.010
Google Scholar
Bevan C., Green D. P., Farmer H., Rose M., Cater K., Stanton Fraser D. S., Brown H. (2019). Behind the curtain of the “Ultimate Empathy Machine”: On the composition of virtual reality nonfiction experiences. In CHI 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paper 506. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300736
Google Scholar
Blanke O., Slater M., Serino A. (2015). Behavioral, neural, and computational principles of bodily self-consciousness. Neuron, 88(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.029
Google Scholar
Blascovich J., Loomis J., Beall A. C., Swinth K. R., Hoyt C. L., Bailenson J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychology Inquiry, 13(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01
Google Scholar
Bloom P. (2017). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. Random House.
Google Scholar
Botvinick M., Cohen J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784
Google Scholar
Chartrand T. L., Bargh J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
Google Scholar
de Vignemont F. (2011). Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.004
Google Scholar
Gallagher S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5
Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Franco M., Slater M., Birney M. E., Swapp D., Haslam S. A., Reicher S. D. (2018). Participant concerns for the learner in a Virtual Reality replication of the Milgram obedience study. PLOS ONE, 13(12), Article e0209704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209704
Google Scholar
Greenwald A. G., McGhee D. E., Schwartz J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
Google Scholar
Groom V., Bailenson J. N., Nass C. (2009). The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments. Social Influence, 4(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802643750
Google Scholar
Hasler B., Spanlang B., Slater M. (2017). Virtual race transformation reverses racial in-group bias. PLOS ONE, 12(4), Article e0174965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174965
Google Scholar
Kishore S., Spanlang B., Iruretagoyena G., Szostak D., Slater M. (2021). A virtual reality embodiment technique to enhance helping behavior of police toward a victim of police racial aggression. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality, 28, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00339
Google Scholar
Kross E., Ayduk O. (2017). Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. In Olson J. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, pp. 81–136). Elsevier.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Maister L., Sebanz N., Knoblich G., Tsakiris M. (2013). Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition, 128(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.002
Google Scholar
Milgram S. (2009). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper Perennial Modern Thought. (Original work published 1974)
Google Scholar
Mischkowski D., Kross E., Bushman B. J. (2012). Flies on the wall are less aggressive: Self-distancing “in the heat of the moment” reduces aggressive thoughts, angry feelings and aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1187–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.012
Google Scholar
Nakamura L. (2020). Feeling good about feeling bad: Virtuous virtual reality and the automation of racial empathy. Journal of Visual Culture, 19(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906259
Google Scholar
Neyret S., Navarro X., Beacco A., Oliva R., Bourdin P., Valenzuela J., Barberia I., Slater M. (2020). An embodied perspective as a victim of sexual harassment in virtual reality reduces action conformity in a later Milgram Obedience scenario. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 6207. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62932-w
Google Scholar
Pan X., Hamilton A. F. de C. (2018). Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12290
Google Scholar
Peck T. C., Seinfeld S., Aglioti S. M., Slater M. (2013). Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016
Google Scholar
Petkova V. I., Ehrsson H. H. (2008). If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLOS ONE, 3(12), Article e3832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003832
Google Scholar
Sanchez-Vives M. V., Slater M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1651
Google Scholar
Singer M. G. (1963). The Golden Rule. Philosophy, 38(146), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100058290
Google Scholar
Slater M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
Google Scholar
Slater M., Sanchez-Vives M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, Article 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
Google Scholar
Slater M., Spanlang B., Sanchez-Vives M. V., Blanke O. (2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLOS ONE, 5(5), Article e10564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010564
Google Scholar
Staub E., Vollhardt J. (2008). Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014223
Google Scholar
Storbeck J., Clore G. L. (2007). On the interdependence of cognition and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), 1212–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701438020
Google Scholar
Sutherland I. E. (1965). The ultimate display. In Kalenich W. A. (Ed.), Information processing 1965: Proceedings of IFIP Congress 65 (Vol. 2, pp. 506–508). Spartan Books.
Google Scholar
Yee N., Bailenson J. N., Ducheneaut N. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330254
Google Scholar